Endorsing Proposition 34 to End the Death Penalty in California

NACDL endorses Proposition 34 as a more effective, just, and cost-efficient method of preventing, solving, and punishing crime.

WHEREAS, the Savings Accountability and Full Enforcement (SAFE) for California ballot initiative would replace the death penalty in California with life without the possibility of parole,

WHEREAS, the SAFE California Act will appear on the November 2012 ballot as Proposition 34,

WHEREAS, “Executing the Will of Voters?: A Roadmap to Mend or End the California Legislature’s Multi-Billion-Dollar Death Penalty Debacle,” a study conducted by U.S. District Judge Arthur Alacon and Loyola Law School Los Angeles professor Paula Mitchell, determined that the State of California currently spends more than $184 million each year on its capital punishment system,

WHEREAS, California spends this exorbitant amount of money to retain the death penalty although the state has executed only 13 people in 33 years,

WHEREAS, 46% of murders and 56% of rapes in California go unsolved each year,

WHEREAS, Proposition 34 seeks to balance California’s spending and public safety priorities by directing $100 million currently being spent on the death penalty in California to law enforcement agencies to help solve open homicide and rape cases,  

WHEREAS, Proposition 34 also requires those convicted of murder to work and pay restitution into a state victim compensation fund, 

WHEREAS, NACDL has a long-standing, vigorous, and vocal opposition to the imposition of the death penalty for crime,

WHEREAS, Proposition 34 advances the principles of justice championed by NACDL,

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, NACDL endorses Proposition 34 as a more effective, just, and cost-efficient method of preventing, solving, and punishing crime.

San Francisco, CA

Explore keywords to find information

RECENTLY ADDED & UPCOMING

  1. The Champion
    March/April 2025 Cover

    March/April 2025

    What are the evidentiary implications of field sobriety tests in marijuana cases? Does the odor of marijuana give officers probable cause to search a vehicle?

  2. Amicus Brief
    March/April 2025 Cover

    Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP v. Executive Office of the President

    Brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and New York Council of Defense Lawyers as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

  3. News Release

    Nation’s Defense Bar Reiterates Opposition to Actions Against Law Firms – Washington, DC (March 18, 2025)

    The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) remains deeply concerned over recent executive orders targeting law firms, most recently Paul Weiss and Perkins Coie, and repeats its call to uphold the right to counsel and the independence of the legal profession. Despite a ruling blocking the action against Perkins Coie, the administration has continued to target law firms representing disfavored clients and positions, threatening the right to a zealous defense.

  4. Live Event
    2025 Forensic Science & Technology Seminar Cover

    2025 Forensic Science & Technology Seminar

    "Making Sense of Science: Forensic Science, Technology & the Law"

    LOCATION: Sahara Las Vegas Hotel & Casino, Las Vegas, NV
    DATES: April 24-26, 2025

  5. Trials, Technology, and the Fourth Amendment: Case Law Review [Engage & Exchange]

    EXCLUSIVE NACDL MEMBER BENEFIT
    WHEN:
    Tuesday, April 29, 2:00-3:30pm ET / 11:00am-12:30pm PT
    CLE CREDIT: not available
    COST: Free

Featured Products