Comment Letters to U.S. Sentencing Commission

Four separate comment letters were filed with the U.S. Sentencing Commission on 8/15/2005 in connection with its recent decision to add the privilege waiver issue to the list of tentative priorities for the 2005-2006 Sentencing Guidelines amendment cycle.

August 16, 2005
By R. Larson Frisby

Four separate comment letters were filed with the U.S. Sentencing Commission on 8/16/2005 in connection with its recent decision to add the privilege waiver issue to the list of tentative priorities for the 2005-2006 Sentencing Guidelines amendment cycle. In particular, the comment letters include the following:

  1. Comment letter signed by nine former senior Justice Department officials (i.e., former Attorneys General Griffin Bell, Ed Meese, and Dick Thornburgh, former Acting Attorney General Stuart Gerson, former Deputy Attorneys General Carol Dinkins and George Terwilliger, and former Solicitors General Ted Olson, Ken Starr, and Seth Waxman);
  2. Comment letter submitted by our informal Coalition on the Privilege Waiver Amendment to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines (signed by the American Chemistry Council, the American Civil Liberties Union, the Association of Corporate Counsel, Business Civil Liberties, Inc., the Business Roundtable, the Financial Services Roundtable, Frontiers of Freedom, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, the National Association of Manufacturers, the National Defense Industrial Association, the Retail Industry Leaders Association, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and the Washington Legal Foundation);
  3. Comment letter submitted by Rep. Dan Lungren (R-CA), who sits on the House Judiciary Committee and its Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security; and
  4. Comment letter of the American Bar Association.

I would like to thank everyone in the Coalition for your assistance and input during the preparation of these various comment letters. In addition, I would like to specially thank Paul Rosenzweig of the Heritage Foundation, Steve Bronis of Zuckerman Spaeder LLP (representing the ABA Criminal Justice Section), Stephanie Martz of the NACDL, Susan Hackett of the Association of Corporate Counsel, Allan Van Fleet of Vinson & Elkins LLP (representing the ABA Antitrust Section), Jamie Conrad of the American Chemistry Council, Tom Susman of Ropes & Gray LLP (representing the ABA Administrative Law Section), Steve Saltzburg of George Washington University (representing the ABA Criminal Justice Section), and Pete Moser of Piper Rudnick Gray Cary LLP (representing the ABA Business Law Section) for helping to recruit the nine former senior DOJ officials to sign the first comment letter listed above.

I would also like to thank Warren Belmar of Capitol Counsel Group LLC (representing the ABA Administrative Law Section) for helping the coalition to persuade Rep. Lungren to send the third comment letter referenced above.

I am hopeful that these four comment letters will help convince the Sentencing Commission to retain the privilege waiver issue on its final list of priority issues for the 2005-06 amendment cycle, and at the end of that process, to amend the Guidelines Commentary to clarify that waiver of attorney-client privilege and work product protections should not be a factor in determining whether a sentencing reduction is warranted for cooperation with the government.

If you have any questions regarding any of these comment letters, please let me know. Otherwise, we will keep you apprised of further developments.

Explore keywords to find information

RECENTLY ADDED & UPCOMING

  1. The Champion
    March/April 2025 Cover

    March/April 2025

    What are the evidentiary implications of field sobriety tests in marijuana cases? Does the odor of marijuana give officers probable cause to search a vehicle?

  2. Amicus Brief
    March/April 2025 Cover

    Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP v. Executive Office of the President

    Brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and New York Council of Defense Lawyers as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

  3. News Release

    Nation’s Defense Bar Reiterates Opposition to Actions Against Law Firms – Washington, DC (March 18, 2025)

    The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) remains deeply concerned over recent executive orders targeting law firms, most recently Paul Weiss and Perkins Coie, and repeats its call to uphold the right to counsel and the independence of the legal profession. Despite a ruling blocking the action against Perkins Coie, the administration has continued to target law firms representing disfavored clients and positions, threatening the right to a zealous defense.

  4. Live Event
    2025 Forensic Science & Technology Seminar Cover

    2025 Forensic Science & Technology Seminar

    "Making Sense of Science: Forensic Science, Technology & the Law"

    LOCATION: Sahara Las Vegas Hotel & Casino, Las Vegas, NV
    DATES: April 24-26, 2025

  5. Trials, Technology, and the Fourth Amendment: Case Law Review [Engage & Exchange]

    EXCLUSIVE NACDL MEMBER BENEFIT
    WHEN:
    Tuesday, April 29, 2:00-3:30pm ET / 11:00am-12:30pm PT
    CLE CREDIT: not available
    COST: Free