Filter Results

Keywords
Active Filters
X Border Search
Filter by Topic
Jurisdiction
Filter by Content Type

Showing 1 - 8 of 8 results

  1. Alasaad v. Wolf

    Corrected Brief of Amicus Curiae National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees and Affirmance.

    • Media

    Border Searches: Keeping the Government Out of Your Digital Devices at the Border [webinar]

    Presented by: Esha Bhandari, Staff Attorney, Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, American Civil Liberties Union
    • Content Page

    Border Searches & Digital Devices

    Courts have long made it clear that agents can search the bags of people entering the country. For the past decade or so, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has applied that logic to digital devices. NACDL members are uniquely exposed to abuse in this context: digita
    • Content Page

    Border Searches & Digital Devices: Case List

    NACDL has compiled a resource of district court cases that deal with the border search exception and digital devices, with special attention paid to challenges to digital searches after the landmark Riley v. California decision. The case list accompanies a primer to educate attorneys about the implications of CBP's claimed powers and offer strategies that will help them comply with their ethical obligations and responsibilities to their clients when entering the U.S.

    • Document

    Abidor v. Napolitano Complaint 9/7/2010

    NACDL and ACLU complaint filed against the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) challenging the DHS policy authorizing suspicionless search and seizure of travelers' electronic devices.
    • Brief

    United States v. Cotterman

    Amicus curiae brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and the Electronic Frontier Foundation in support of defendant-appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc. In a prosecution for production, possession and importation of child pornography and obscene materials, the panel held that a search of the defendant’s laptop that began at the border and ended two days later at a government forensic laboratory almost 170 miles away fell within the border search doctrine. 
    • Brief

    United States v. Molina-Isidoro

    Brief of Amici Curiae Electronic Frontier Foundation, Asian Americans Advancing Justice-Asian Law Caucus, Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), CAIR California, CAIR Florida, CAIR New York, CAIR Ohio, and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in Support of Defendant-Appellant.
    • Brief

    United States v. Kolsuz

    Brief of Amici Curiae Electronic Frontier Foundation, Asian Americans Advancing Justice-Asian Law Caucus, Brennan Center for Justice, Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), CAIR California, CAIR Florida, CAIR Missouri, CAIR New York, CAIR Ohio, CAIR Dallas/Fort Worth, and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in Support of Defendant-Appellant.