Renewed War on Drugs, harsher charging policies, stepped-up criminalization of immigrants — in the current climate, joining the NACDL is more important than ever. Members of NACDL help to support the only national organization working at all levels of government to ensure that the voice of the defense bar is heard.
Take a stand for a fair, rational, and humane criminal legal system
Contact members of congress, sign petitions, and more
Help us continue our fight by donating to NFCJ
Help shape the future of the association
Join the dedicated and passionate team at NACDL
Increase brand exposure while building trust and credibility
NACDL is committed to enhancing the capacity of the criminal defense bar to safeguard fundamental constitutional rights.
NACDL harnesses the unique perspectives of NACDL members to advocate for policy and practice improvements in the criminal legal system.
NACDL envisions a society where all individuals receive fair, rational, and humane treatment within the criminal legal system.
NACDL’s mission is to serve as a leader, alongside diverse coalitions, in identifying and reforming flaws and inequities in the criminal legal system, and redressing systemic racism, and ensuring that its members and others in the criminal defense bar are fully equipped to serve all accused persons at the highest level.
Showing 16 - 30 of 60 results
Letter to the Judicial Conference Standing Committee on Rules of Practice & Procedure regarding proposed rule changes to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and Federal Rules of Evidence.
Letter to the Judicial Conference Standing Committee on Rules of Practice & Procedure regarding proposed rule changes to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Federal Rules of Evidence, and Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Letter to the Judicial Conference Committee on Practice & Procedure regarding proposed changes to the Federal Rules of Evidence.
An attorney representing an incarcerated client has just received a package of discovery from the prosecutor. In some jurisdictions, counsel can send physical copies of the discovery to the client or electronic copies to the client’s facility. Other jurisdictions, however, forbid counsel from giving the client copies of the discovery: counsel and her staff must chaperone the discovery, even if that means the client can hand copy everything counsel brings to her. Lisa Steele provides suggestions for creating a record to challenge exclusive custody rules and protect a client’s rights.
President Gerald Goldstein's written statement to the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and House Government Reform and Oversight Subcommittee on National Security, International Affairs and Criminal Justice regarding government and law enforcement conduct in the 1993 confrontation between Branch Davidians and law enforcement in Waco, TX, and proposed changes in Exclusionary Rule Reform Act of 1995 (H.R. 666) and Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Improvement Act of 1995 (S. 3).
Susan Davis's written statement to the House Judiciary Committee regarding Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 1997 (H.R. 1965).
The panel held that the cumulative effect of the following errors rendered the defendant’s trial fundamentally unfair.
Court holds the district erred in admitting evidence of a prior conviction.
Order of Dismissal Following Grand Jury Abuse in a case involving involuntary manslaughter for the death of a child on a waterpark slide the Attorney General claimed was the result of negligence from the water park in the design, engineering, and construction of the attraction, billed as the tallest water slide in the world.
Motion to Suppress Traffic Stop for Following Too Closely.
Materials for arguing against government informant and ex parte discussions regarding the conspiracy and closing off discovery regarding the informant's statements regarding the alleged conspiracy.
Getting Facebook into Evidence.
Call Detail Records - What you should get in discovery from opposing counsel.
Motion for the production of testimony put before the grand jury in support of the charges of drug distribution, or conspiracy to distribute drugs with the intent to commit rape. This testimony is sought to “avoid a possible injustice”: Nunez’s status as the subject of a prosecution that is not supported by any evidence.
The district court’s admission of evidence regarding a prior bad act was an abuse of discretion.